polygenic risk score/polygenic score Archive — Page 2 of 3
-
June 16, 2021
VUMC joins national effort to improve disease prediction in diverse populations
Vanderbilt University Medical Center will participate in a new federal initiative aimed at improving the use of polygenic risk scores (PRS) to predict complex diseases in diverse populations. -
May 13, 2021
People at high genetic risk for colorectal cancer benefit more from lifestyle changes
People with a high polygenic risk score for colorectal cancer could benefit more at preventing the disease by leading healthy lifestyles than those at lower genetic risk, according to a study by Vanderbilt researchers published in the April issue of The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. -
March 11, 2021
Genotype looms large in risk for post-op arrhythmia
Postoperative atrial fibrillation (PoAF), a form of arrhythmia, complicates 20-40% of cardiac surgical procedures and 10–20% of non-cardiac thoracic operations, cropping up two to four days after surgery to pose risk of stroke, heart attack, mortality, longer hospital stays and greater cost. -
March 9, 2021
Study incorporates genetics with smoking history to identify high-risk smokers for lung cancer screening
A study by Vanderbilt researchers that analyzed both smoking history and genetic risk variants for lung cancer supports modifying current guidelines to include additional smokers for lung cancer screening. -
August 10, 2020
A step toward cancer prevention
A computational technique that combines the effect of multiple genomic variants has the potential to identify high-risk individuals for cancer prevention. -
April 23, 2020
Polygenic scores identify those at high cancer risk
A team of Vanderbilt researchers constructed polygenic risk scores (PRS) based on genomic variants associated with eight common cancers and concluded they could potentially be used for personalized risk assessments. -
February 27, 2020
Study finds certain genetic test not useful in predicting heart disease risk
A Polygenic Risk Score — a genetic assessment that doctors have hoped could predict coronary heart disease (CHD) in patients — has been found not to be a useful predictive biomarker for disease risk.